By MARK PEARSON Follow @Journlaw
Social media presents limitless alternatives, however skilled communicators want efficient threat evaluation methods to evaluate potential authorized dangers when posting or internet hosting content material.
A stakeholder-oriented strategy to threat minimization may help social media managers and moderators anticipate, establish, handle and steadiness these risks and alternatives.
In our new e-book, colleague Susan Grantham and I’ve recognized ten key questions a corporation might ask to find out their degree of authorized social media publicity.
I evaluation these ten questions and 5 extra particular questions to research the precise authorized dangers of social media in my newest weblog in Griffith College’s Skilled Studying Hub Thought Management sequence right here.
If you’re a communications skilled who needs to review on this space, contemplate enrolling in our on-line programs in Social Media Legislation and Danger Administration (postgraduate) or Media Legislation (undergraduate).
Disclaimer: As I write about regulation and media ethics, nothing right here must be construed as authorized recommendation. I’m an educational, not a lawyer. My solely recommendation is to seek the advice of a lawyer earlier than taking any authorized dangers.
© Mark Pearson 2021 – the writer’s ethical proper has been affirmed.
recorded beneath censorship, communication, defamation, first modification, freedom of expression, mental property, web, journalism, journalism training, defamation, media ethics, media freedom, media regulation, media literacy, media regulation, nationwide safety, open justice , freedom of the press, privateness, public relations, reflective apply, threat, threat administration, social media, sub judice, suppression
Supply : journlaw.com